Cyter Tax is the Australian tax analysis AI — turn any tax question into a structured, cited memo with legislation, rulings and case law in one response.
Ask questions here to get answers about laws, rules and how they've been applied.
Enter a question
A complete research workflow — ask, verify, write up, and download.
One folder per client, one project per matter. Everything stays structured and easy to find.
Client X Pty Ltd
3 projects
Search the full tax corpus or narrow to statutes, case law, or specific ATO ruling types.
Ask in plain English, get answers traced by a citation linked to the statute, ruling or case.
Ask questions here to get answers about laws, rules and how they've been applied.
Hover on any citation to verify — nothing made up.
Unfrankable Distributions from Share Capital Account: A distribution is unfrankable if it is sourced, directly or indirectly, from a company’s share capital account. 3 This applies to distributions that constitute a reduction or return of share capital, even if labelled as a dividend. 4 The definition of a share capital account includes an account a company keeps of its share capital, or any other account where the first amount credited was share capital. 5 Therefore, any portion of a selective buyback that is a return of share capital cannot be franked.
Benchmark Franking Percentage: A corporate tax entity franks a distribution by allocating a franking credit to it. 6 The benchmark franking percentage is a key concept in determining the maximum franking without penalty. If an entity franks a frankable distribution at a percentage that exceeds its benchmark franking percentage for the franking period, it is liable to pay over-franking tax. 7 This effectively sets the benchmark franking percentage as the maximum franking allowed without incurring a penalty.
Send any passage to ThoughtPad with one click. Build your research document as you go.
If a trustee has a power to change the beneficiaries under a trust and exercises that power, does it cause a CGT event to occur?
In Short: A trustee's valid exercise of a power to change beneficiaries under a trust generally does not cause a Capital Gains Tax (CGT) event to occur, specifically CGT events E1 or E2, unless the change terminates the existing trust and creates a new one, or causes an asset to be held under a separate charter of obligations.
Relevant Legislation: Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), s 104-5 — provides a summary of CGT events, including E1, E2, E5, E6, E7, E8, and A1.
Relevant Case Law and Ruling: TR 2018/6 — confirms that amending a trust's vesting date through a valid exercise of power in a trust deed or court approval does not trigger CGT event E1.
CGT Events E1 and E2: A change in the terms of a trust, including the addition or exclusion of beneficiaries, pursuant to a valid exercise of a power in the trust deed, will generally not cause CGT event E1 or E2 to happen.
CGT Event E5: CGT event E5 occurs if a beneficiary becomes absolutely entitled to a CGT asset of a trust as against the trustee. For a beneficiary to be absolutely entitled, they must have a vested and indefeasible interest in the entire trust asset and the right to call for its transfer.
CGT Events E6 and E7: CGT event E6 happens if a trustee disposes of a CGT asset to a beneficiary in satisfaction of an income right, and E7 happens for a capital right.
Passages you send will appear here
Enter the client facts. Click Write Up. Get a polished, cited document ready for review.
Optionally provide the facts of your situation for fact-application analysis. Leave blank to reorganise and professionalise the content.
Take your Cyter Tax research and apply it straight into an existing client document. The Augmenter marks up the document in tracked redlines — pulling in new findings, citations, and tightened wording — so you can review and accept every change.
Tell the Augmenter what to change. It will mark up your existing document with tracked redlines so you can review every edit before accepting.
Export to Word with full citations, partial citations, or none — your choice.
Cyter Tax is an Australian Tax Analysis AI: instead of returning raw search results, it generates legal-memo-style analysis structured the way Australian tax practitioners read and write. Every section maps to how working tax advice is organised, with citations that hold up to professional scrutiny.
A typical Australian tax memo follows a recognisable structure: a brief conclusion, a list of applicable provisions, a discussion of relevant authorities, and the practitioner's reasoning applying those authorities to the facts. Cyter's response format mirrors this exactly. The "In Short" section gives the conclusion. "Relevant Legislation" and "Relevant Case Law and Rulings" list the authorities. The "Explanation" walks through the reasoning, citing each step.
This is not coincidence — the system instruction explicitly directs the AI to write like a senior associate drafting a research memo, with conclusions before reasoning, active voice, sentences under 25 words, and one citation per paragraph. The output is formatted for professional use, not for chatbot conversation.
Cyter does not invent analysis where the sources are silent. If the Australian tax law genuinely does not resolve a question — common in novel structures, untested provisions or recent legislative changes — the response will tell you the sources are inconclusive. This is intentional and correct: the alternative is fabricating analysis, which is the exact failure mode Cyter is designed to avoid.
The practitioner remains responsible for applying the analysis to specific client facts and exercising professional judgement. Cyter is a research and synthesis tool, not a substitute for professional advice.
Try Cyter Tax free with 5 queries on the full Australian tax corpus.
No credit card required. 5 free queries to try it out.